SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 145

C.PRAVEEN KUMAR, K.MANMADHA RAO
M. Bharathi – Appellant
Versus
K. Subbamma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : K. ANANDA RAO
For the Respondent: V.S.R. ANJANEYALU

JUDGMENT :

K.MANMADHA RAO, J.

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arises against the order in I.A No.35 of 2019 in O.S.No.12 of 2018 on the file of VI Additional District & Sessions Judge,-cum-Special Court for trial of offences against Women, Chittoor (for short “Court below”), dated 27.01.2020 dismissing the said Interlocutory Application with costs for grant of temporary injunction restraining the respondent/defendant from creating any encumbrances or alienating the petition schedule property in favour of third parties or between the parties till disposal of the main suit and also granted ad-interim injunction orders to that effect till disposal of the main suit.

2. The appellants herein are the petitioners in I.A., and the plaintiffs in the suit before the Court below. The respondent herein is the respondent in the I.A., and the defendant in the suit before the Court below.

3. The appellants herein filed O.S.No.12 of 2018 before the Court below against the respondent herein seeking grant of decree and judgment in favour of the plaintiffs, directing the defendant to receive the balance of sale consideration of Rs.2,00,000/- form the appellants and to execute a regular register sale deed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top