SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 185

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, V. SUJATHA, JJ.
M/s. Divine Chemtee Ltd. & Another - Petitioners
Versus
Principal Commissioner of Customs & Others - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 13794 of 2020
Decided On : 05-05-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Y. Sreenivasa Reddy.
For the Respondents: Suresh Kumar Routhu.

Point of Law : Petitioner having licence to trade, storage of goods outside the SEZ area namely in a bonded warehouse, for the reasons stated earlier, cannot automatically confer power on the DRI Officers to initiate proceedings under the Customs Act.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - SEZ Act – Sections 11, 51 and 53 - Customs Act, 1962 - Section 7 - Special Economic Zones Rules, 2003 - Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sub-Section (1) - Manufacture of Bio-Diesel and Glycerine - Show Cause Notice - Foreign and domestic investments for promoting export - It was registered as a unit of Special Economic Zone (SEZ) with Special Economic Zone (VSEZ) vide Letter of conducting authorized operations of manufacture of Bio Diesel and Glycerine - Commerce Ministry issued another LOA - removal of the goods from SEZ area or storage of goods in bonded warehouse for the purpose of export, imported under a licence issued for the said purpose as and when vessel is available or otherwise, in our view, cannot be brought within the purview of DRI officials under the Customs Act and it is only officials under SEZ Act, who would be bestowed with jurisdiction to initiate the proceedings. (Para 33)

Finding of the Court:

Documents submitted to Customs/SEZ authorities at time of export of goods by XCL Ans. Commercial Invoice - Whether all the goods exported by your company were moved from your SEZ unit or not - Goods which moved from SEZ, the shipping Bills were filed at SEZ. In respect of the goods exported from outside SEZ, shipping bills were filed at port of loading - Petitioner is having licence to trade, storage of goods outside the SEZ area namely in a bonded warehouse, for reasons stated earlier, cannot automatically confer power on DRI Officers to initiate proceedings under the Customs Act - Learned Assistant Solicitor General would contend that a Bill is being introduced in the Parliament making suitable amendments, but no information about same is placed before this Court - Court hold that the DRI officials have no jurisdiction to issue the impugned show cause notice.

Result: Writ Petition is allowed

ORDER :

C. Praveen Kumar, J.

The present Writ Petition came to be filed to declare the Order-in-Original No.VIZ-CUSTOM-000-COM-009-20-21, dated 30.06.2020, passed by the 1st respondent pursuant to the reply given to the Show Cause Notice dated 11.12.2014, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction.

2. The circumstances, which lead to filing of the present Writ Petition, are as under:-

(a) The 1st petitioner is a private limited company engaged in manufacture of Bio-Diesel and Glycerine at Visakhapatnam Special Economic Zones (VSEZ). It was registered as a unit of Special Economic Zone (SEZ) with Visakhapatnam Special Economic Zone (VSEZ) vide Letter of Approval (LOA) dated 17.05.2006, granted by the Board of Approvals (BOA), New Delhi, for conducting authorized operations of manufacture of Bio Diesel and Glycerine. The Commerce Ministry issued another LOA dated 30.07.2009, allowing trading in Bio Diesel, as an authorized operation, by the 1st petitioner.

(b) It is seen from the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 [for short, “the Act”], the Government of India has announced the Special Economic Zone scheme in April, 2000 with a view to provide internationally competitive environment for exports. The objectives of Special Economic Zones includes making available goods and services, free of taxes and duties supported by integrated infrastructure for export production, expeditious and single window approval mechanism and a package of incentives to attract foreign and domestic investments for promoting export lead growth. The SEZ units are put under the administrative control of the Development Commissioners under the Ministry of Commerce to grant necessary permissions, to provide other facilities and also to undertake investigation and impose penalties for violation of any of the provisions of the Act.

(c) Before introduction of SEZ Act, 2005, the working of SEZ was regulated by the provisions contained in Chapter XA of the Customs Act, 1962. As per Notification dated 14.03.2006, the provisions of Chapter XA of the Customs Act, 1962 were specifically made not applicable to the working of the SEZ. The Central Government through Ministry of Commerce and in exercise of the power granted under Section 21(1) of the SEZ Act, 2005 specified the officers with the powers of investigation, inspection or search or seizure as provided under the said Act and the Development Commissioner of the respective SEZ has been made the Enforcement Officer under sub-section (2) of Section 21 of the Act. The officers of Customs are notified as proper officers under the SEZ Act, 2005 only with effect from 05.08.2016, with a condition that the said Officer is required to report before the 3rd respondent within seven days, the details of action if any, initiated by it. Therefore, any violation by a unit in SEZ was to be investigated under the SEZ Act, 2005 only by the Development Commissioner i.e., respondent no.3 herein till 05.08.2016.

(d) The petitioner has been undertaking authorized operations i.e., manufacture of Bio Diesel and export of the same and also trading of the said goods as permitted under the Letters of Approval, dated 17.06.2006 and 30.07.2009, from its manufacturing premises located within the SEZ area at Visakhapatnam. During 2009-10 and 2010-11, the petitioner imported four consignments of Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME) of different grades from M/s. Natural Bio Energy LLC, USA and exported Bio Diesel manufactured with certain specifications, after undertaking blending and other operations on the imported FAME with the Bio Diesel of different grades manufactured at the factory situated in VSEZ.

(e) The petitioner imported four consignments by duly filing Bill of Entries, transferred and stored the material in the Bonded Warehouse of M/s.East India Petroleum Ltd (EIPL) at Visakhapatnam. It is also to be not

                        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                        1
                        2
                        3
                        4
                        5
                        6
                        7
                        8
                        9
                        10
                        11
                        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                        supreme today icon
                        logo-black

                        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                        Please visit our Training & Support
                        Center or Contact Us for assistance

                        qr

                        Scan Me!

                        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                        whatsapp-icon Back to top