IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J.
V. Narendra Babu – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 10882 of 2021
Decided On : 31-01-2022
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 120B, 403, 408, 420 and 477A - Information Technology Act, 2008 - Section 66C r/w 43 - Companies Act, 1956 – Offence of Criminal Conspiracy and Cheating - Quash the F.I.R - De facto complainant is one of directors of the said VEMPL. It is stated that VEMPL over the past 10 years and Sri Chaitanya over past 35 years developed intellectual property which includes academic curriculum, study material, teaching methods, teaching points, pupil's activity, teacher's activity, questioning hypothesis, evaluation, teacher's ability, programmes, question bank, academic knowledge, experience driven programmes by utilizing faculty and resources throughout country by spending several crores of rupees and stored and saved said intellectual property for exclusive use of said educational institutions in hard disks of computer systems in an encrypted storage by installing best antivirus software with a strong password to prevent hacking or gaining access to outsiders - Held, Power of High Court to quash F.I.R. or to interfere with investigation has to be exercised sparingly with circumspection where allegations in the F.I.R. even on its face value do not constitute any offence and that the High Court should be loath to interfere at early/pre-mature stage of investigation - As it is stated by the learned Government Pleader for Home on instructions that the investigation is now being done by Inspector of Police, it is not contrary to mandate of Section 78 of the I.T. Act - To sum up, facts of case coupled with the prima-facie evidence that is available on record as discussed supra, prima-facie, constitute an offence punishable under Sections 66 r/w. 43(a) and (b) and Section 66C of the I.T. Act against A1 to A3 and the facts also constitute an offence punishable under Sections 66 r/w. 43(a) of the I.T. Act against A4 and A5. Therefore, F.I.R. in respect of the said offences is not liable to be quashed against petitioners - Writ Petition is partly allowed.
ORDER :
1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed seeking a mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent-Station House Officer of Kankipadu Police Station, Vijayawada City, in registering the FIR in Crime No. 239/2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 403, 408, 420 and 477A of IPC and under Section 66C read with Section 43 of the Information Technology Act, 2008, against the petitioners on the basis of the report lodged by the de facto complainant, who is the 4th respondent, as unconstitutional and consequently to set aside the same.
2. Facts of the prosecution case, germane to dispose of this writ petition, as set out in the FIR, may be stated as follows:
(b) Except the Executive Dean, Dean or Data Analyst of the branches of VEMPL, the said data stored in the computer system is not accessible to any other person.
(c) The said VEMPL, in the brand name of Sri Chaitanya, has established Gosala branches at Gosala campus of Vijayawada in the year 2014 and has been imparting education and giving coaching etc. to the students. The management of VEMPL, Sri Chaitanya group appointed accused 1 to 3 i.e. Mr. V. Narendra Babu (accused No. 1) as an Executive Dean, Sri N. Srinivasa Rao (accused No. 2) as a Dean and Sri G. Balakrishna Prasad (accused No. 3) as a Data Analyst in the year 2014. They have entered into Employment Agreements with VEMPL which are being renewed from time to time and it is stated that they are still in force. Therefore, they have domain over the entire infrastructure including the computers, hardware and software and they got exclusive access to them. The accused 1 to 3 have agreed in their Employment Agreements that they shall not use the confidential information entrusted to them by the employer at any time directly or indirectly to have personal commercial advantage or to do anything which is detrimental to the business or activities of the employer in any manner and that the said concepts, ideas etc. written or electronically developed by the employee during the course of his employment, exclusively belong to the company and also gave an undertaking to keep confidentiality of the same. Therefore, reposing confidence in the accused 1 to 3, the company has entrusted the said confidential and valuable computer data and details of the students in good faith to the accused 1 to 3 by providing passwords of the computer systems to them for the purpose of using the said data exclusively for the purpose of running the educational institutions, establishments and schools belonging to the employer and for using the same to impart education to the students studying in Gosala branches of Sri Chaitanya group.
(d) It is stated that while so, accused 1 to 3 stopped attending duties from 16-5-2021 ab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.