SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(AP) 966

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Digivinti Subramanyam Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Pulipati Radhika.

ORDER :

1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

    “To issue an order or direction, in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the notice dated 10.06.2021 issued under Section 7 of the Land Encroachment Act, 1905 in respect of land admeasuring Ac. 0.70 cents in Sy. No. 232 situated in Tirumandyam village, Chittoor District contemplating to evict the petitioner summarily as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the notice dated 10.06.2021 issued under Section 7 of the Land Encroachment Act, 1905 in respect of land admeasuring Ac. 0.70 cents in Sy. No. 232 situated in Tirumandyam village, Chittoor District and pass such other order or orders.”

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is in long possession and enjoyment of the property having purchased the same under the registered sale deed, and his name was also mutated in the revenue records. While the matter stood thus, notice dated 10.06.2021 was issued under Section 7 of Madras Act 03 of 1905 to the petitioner.

3. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top