ORDER:

1. This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the 2nd respondent in proposing to conduct enquiry against the petitioner stating that the same is contrary to the order dated 23.03.2021 passed in W.P.No.24885 of 2020 and also to hold that the charge memo that was issued on 04.08.2021 is contrary to law as the signatory does not have the jurisdiction.

2. This Court has heard Sri G. Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the 1st and 2nd respondents.

3. The facts are not in dispute in this case. Sri Ramesh Babu submits that the enquiry sought to be initiated against the petitioner cannot be continued in view of the findings of the learned single Judge in W.P.No.24885 of 2020. He points out that the petitioner, who was working as an Enforcement Superintendent, took up investigation and registered a crime in the Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Pedakurapadu, and a mobile phone belonging to a person was seized. It was handed over to one Smt. Ch.Geetha, Sub-Inspector, who is his subordinate, for the purpose of taking a copy of all the data in the phone. It was found that the phone contained sexually e