2022 Supreme(AP) 295
RAVI NATH TILHARI
Gochipatha Kalyani – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, General Administration (Ser-A) – Respondent
Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri K. Suri Sai Sanjay
JUDGMENT :
Heard Sri K. Suri Sai Sanjay, learned counsel, representing Sri Nagendra Paragati, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief:
“...to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned order Rc.No.1581/2019-B5, dated 11-06-2021 passed by the 2nd respondent in not considering the case of the petitioner stating that “the applicant is not eligible one for compassionate appointment being a married daughter and her request cannot be considered as per Govt. Memo No.406/1/A1/ Admn/11/2004, dated 20-03-2004” which is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to Government Memo 116417/Ser.A/2003-1, dated 08-10-2003, Memo No.55769/Ser.A/993, dated 27-01-2000, G.O.Ms.No.350, dated 30-07-1990 and Government Memo No.406/10/A1/Admn.II/2004, dated 20-03- 2004 and violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and also violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.10340 of 2014, dated 26-02-2021 and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Government Employee in any suitable po
Click Here to Read the rest of this document