SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 182

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J.
Datla Narayana Raju – Appellant
Versus
State Of AP – Respondent
Writ Petition Nos.24872 of 2020 & 21068 of 2019
Decided on : 26-1-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : T.S.N. SUDHAKAR

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 21 , 226 snd 300-A - Right to Information Act - Burial ground - Endorsement - Case of petitioners is that for last 100 years the burial ground of Village, Mandal to an extent of Ac.3.96 cents in Sy.No.79/1 was allotted by Grama Panchayath for purpose of funeral activities of demised persons in the village and since then villagers are using same for their customary funerals - As some encroachers have occupied said burial ground, villagers made a representation before District Collector dated through Programme and after receipt of the said representation, District Collector directed Thasildar to take action for eviction of encroachers from burial ground - Pursuantly, Tahsildar made an endorsement, dated informing that they are taking steps to evict encroachers - But 7th respondent obstructed officials by showing the patta issued by 4th respondent/Tahsildar stating that it is a private land and that, he filed - Held, Learned counsel further contended that 5th respondent has issued notice dated and to said notice, 7th respondent issued a reply notice through his counsel, which is placed on record and drawn attention of this Court to same - In said notice, dated nowhere it is stated that the said land is a burial ground and even though received said reply notice, respondent authorities without passing any orders tried to evict 7th respondent, without following due process of law, which is illegal and arbitrary, prayed to pass appropriate orders - Per contra, learned counsel for petitioners submitted that, during pendency of the writ petition, Court has directed Joint Collector to enquire into issue and asked to file a report and accordingly, Joint Collector filed his report categorically stating that land is a burial ground and patta claimed by 7th respondent is fake - Inspite of said report, respondent authorities did not evict 7th respondent - In reply, learned Assistant Government Pleader contended that even petitioners in both these writ petitions in a post haste manner approached Court without giving any breathing time to the authorities to take steps as per Law - Writ petition dispose of

ORDER :

W.P.No.24872 of 2020

This writ petition is filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:

    “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action on the part of the respondents 2 to 6 herein in not taking any action to evict the encroacher/7th respondent, who is obstructing the villagers to go and utilize the burial ground Ac.3.96 cents in Sy.No.79/1 of Sagipudi village, Dondapudi Gram Panchayath, Gopalapuram Mandal, West Godavari District basing on the fabricated Patta L.D.No.183/2012/139 to an extent of Ac.3.10cents in survey No.79/1 of the Tahsildar, Gopalapuram, in view of the proceedings in Rc.No.260/2020/SA, dated 18.06.2020 of the 4th respondent, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the provisions of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 6 to take action against the 7th respondent and evict him and handed over the burial ground to the gram panchayat for utilization of the villagers as per the said endorsement, dated 18.06.2020 by construct the compound wall around the burial ground..”.

2. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:

    “…to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in trying to dispossess the petitioner from his property in R.S.No.79/1 in Sagipadu Village, Dondapudi Panchayat, Gopalapuram Mandal, West Godavari District under the guise of an impugned oral proceedings of the respondents 2 and 4 under Land Acquisition Act with intention to wrongful loss to the petitioners on the ground of „Government Lands? as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary, violative of Article 300-A, 21 of the Constitution of India and pass such other order or orders….”

3. As the issues in these two writ petitions are interrelated, these writ petitions are being disposed of by way of this common order. The parties hereinafter will be referred to with their status in W.P.No.24872 of 2020.

4. The case of the petitioners is that for the last 100 years the burial ground of Sagipudi Village, Gopalapuram Mandal to an extent of Ac.3.96 cents in Sy.No.79/1 was allotted by the Grama Panchayath for the purpose of funeral activities of demised persons in the village and since then the villagers are using the same for their customary funerals. As some encroachers have occupied the said burial ground, the villagers made a representation before the District Collector dated 16.09.2019 through Spandana Programme and after receipt of the said representation, the District Collector directed the Thasildar to take action for eviction of the encroachers from the burial ground. Pursuantly, the Tahsildar made an endorsement, dated 01.10.2019 informing that they are taking steps to evict the encroachers. But the 7th respondent obstructed the officials by showing the patta issued by the 4th respondent/Tahsildar stating that it is a private land and that, he filed W.P.No.21068 of 2019. When an application, dated 20.05.2020 was made to the 4th respondent by a villager by name Sri Mallipudi Yesu Ratnam under Right to Information Act requesting as to whether a patta can be granted to private persons for the land classified as burial ground of the village, if so, under which regulations. In response to the same, it is informed that the land to an extent of Ac.3.96 Cents in Sy.No.79/1 as per the Revenue records of Gopalapuram Mandal has been recorded as burial ground and no patta has been issued from their office in favour of the 7th respondent. Inspite of the same, the authorities have not evicted the 7th respondent from the burial ground, hence, they filed the W.P.No.24872 of 2020.

5. It is the case of the 7th respondent, who is writ petitioner in W.P.No.21068 of 2019, that his father by name Tanuku Kovvadayya has acquired the agricultural land in an extent of Ac.3.10 cents in R.S.No.79/1 and enjoyed the same

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top