JUDGMENT

1. These two writ petitions are filed by one Appinedi Pothuraju and Sayyed Jany under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.1 in interfering with possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the land admeasuring 310.25 Sq.Yds and 351 Sq.Yds respectively situated in R.S.R.No.671/1A of Pedana village and mandal, Krishna District without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct respondent No.1 not to interfere with the civil dispute pending between the petitioners and respondent No.3 over the land referred above.

2. Both these petitions are filed claiming identical relief by different petitioners having different extents of land in the same survey number in Pedana Village and Mandal, Krishna District, and the issue involved in these two petitions is one and the same. Therefore, I am of the view that it is expedient to decide both these petitions by common order.

3. The factual matrix in W.P.No.803 of 2021 is as follows:

Petitioner is claiming that he is the absolute owner of the land 310.25 Sq.Yds situated in R.S.R.No.671/1A of Pedana village and mandal, Krishna Distri