Back
V. SUJATHA
Bokka Rambabu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
This writ petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
2. The case of the petitioner is that, initially, he was appointed as Inspector of Factories on 05.09.2003 and was posted in the Head Office, Hyderabad. Thereafter, he discharged his duties in various places in the erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh from time to time
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the transfer of a government employee should be made in public interest and for administrative reasons, and frequent transfers without justifi....
The transfer of an employee is within the prerogative power of the employer, who can withdraw, alter or modify any previous order of transfer. The court will not interfere under Article 226 of the Co....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the issue of transfer is a prerogative of the employer, and the courts cannot interfere with transfer orders made on administrative grounds un....
Legal malice is insufficient to challenge a transfer order unless clear procedural violations or malafide intentions can be proven.
Point of Law : Transfer of a public servant made on administrative grounds or in public interest should not be interfered with unless there are strong and pressing grounds rendering the transfer orde....
The court affirmed that transfer orders are administrative decisions and should not be interfered with unless proven to be arbitrary or in violation of statutory provisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
