JUDGMENT :

Heard Sri Venkateswarlu Kolla, learned counsel for the appellant.

2. The second plaintiff has come up with this second appeal against the concurrent judgments of the trial Court and the appellate Court.

3. The Plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 laid the suit for perpetual injunction against the sole defendant who is the 1st respondent herein. Their entire claim is based on two (2) unregistered sale deeds marked Ex A1 and Ex A16 at the trial. They further claimed that they are in possession of the property in dispute by virtue of sale deeds and to support such version they also relied on land revenue receipts, notices issued for land acquisition purposes and rough patta, at the trial.

4. The disputed lands are in survey No.224/12 each of Ac 0.60 cents in all Ac 1.20 cents located in different survey numbers, which are described in the plaint schedule. The grievance of the plaintiffs, who are the appellant and the 9th respondent against the sole defendant/1st respondent is that there was attempted interference with their possession and enjoyment without any manner or right and therefore they requested to grant relief against them.

5. The sole defendant/1st respondent resisted the claim of t