C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Sembcorp Energy India Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, J.
Heard Sri Raghavan Ramabadran, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Special Government Pleader for Commercial Tax, for respondent no.1 and Sri Suresh Kumar Routhu, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs [for short, “CBIC”] for respondent nos.2 and 3.
2. The issues involved in all the seven (7) writ petitions are one and the same. It is to be noted that W.P.Nos.11194, 11206 & 11263 of 2021 came to be filed against the order of Additional Commissioner, (GST Appeals) and W.P.Nos.11198, 17275, 28836 & 30292 of 2021 are filed against the order of Deputy Commissioner of Central Tax.
3. W.P.No.11194 of 2021, which is filed, against the order in Appeal No.GUN-GST-000-APP-001-20-21 GST, dated 30.04.2020, wherein the order rejecting refund was upheld, is taken as a lead petition for the purpose of deciding the issues involved.
4. In a nut-shell, the facts in issue, are that there was a Memorandum of Understanding for the purpose of supply of power between India and Bangladesh. The petitioner participated in the tender process floated by the Bangladesh Power Development Board [for short, “BPDB”] and was awarded contract b
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore v. J.H. Gotla
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Alom Extrusions Limited
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Vatika Township Private Limited
Govt. of India v. Indian Tobacco Assn. (2005) 7 SCC 396
R.B. Jodha Mai Kuthiala v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Punjab, Jammu & Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh
T. Kaliamurthi v. Five Gori Thaikkal Wakf
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.