SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1200

K. MANMADHA RAO
Kanneganti Kamalakar – Appellant
Versus
Nishtala Subramanya Satya Venkata – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.Kesava Rao, Advocate, K.Devi Prasanna Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. As the issue involved in these appeals is one and the same, these matters are taken up together for disposal by this Common Judgment.

2. The facts in these appeals are similar and identical, therefore C.M.A.No.472 of 2022 is taken as lead case, and the facts therein are referred to for convenience.

3. The impugned A.S.No.09 of 2021 was filed by the unsuccessful 1st defendant against the decree and judgment in O.S No.21 of 019 dtd. 5/5/2020 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram (for short "the trial Court").

4. For the sake of convenience, the parties in this appeal will be referred to as arrayed before the trial Court.

5. The 1st respondent/plaintiff filed the suit before the trial Court for permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from ever interfering with the exclusive possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property in any manner whatsoever and for costs. The plaintiff is the absolute owner of the property situated at Vizianagaram. Originally, the South Eastern Railway Employees Co-operative Building Society, Vizianagaram, acquired land in an extent of Ac.8.76 cents by way of purchase from several original

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top