V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Chittam Narayana Rao – Appellant
Versus
Achanta Varalakshmi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The judgment debtor before the court executing the decree filed this civil revision petition under article 227 of the constitution of India impugning the order dtd. 13/8/2019 in E.A.No.223 of 2019 in E.P.No.114 of 2014 in O.S.No.494 of 2012 of learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada.
2. Respondent herein is the auction purchaser - cum - decree holder before the court executing the decree.
3. Sri P. Rajasekhar, learned counsel for revision petitioner and Sri A.K. Kishore Reddy, learned counsel for respondent submitted arguments in support of their respective contentions.
4. The following facts are required to be noticed: O.S.No.494 of 2012 before the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada was a suit for recovery of money. After due contest, the suit was decreed on 22/1/2014 in favour of the plaintiff/creditor. Since the decree directions for payment of money were not complied with by the defendant, the decree holder sought for execution of the decree passed in his favour and filed E.P.No.114 of 2014 before the court which passed the decree. That execution was levied under Order XXI Rules 66 and 64 of the CPC requesting the executing court to sell the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.