SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1254

RAVI NATH TILHARI, B. V. L. N. CHAKRAVARTHI
Madakam Naga Durga – Appellant
Versus
Satti Ramana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K.Ramesh Babu, Advocate, A.Jayanthi, Advocate, P.Vinod Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI, J. - Heard Sri Kambhampati Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the Claimants, Smt.A.Jayanthi, learned Standing Counsel for Oriental Insurance Company and Sri P.Vinodkumar, learned Standing Counsel for A.P.S.R.T.C.

2. The appeal in MACMA No.2185/2018 is preferred by the claimants/Appellants (in short, the claimants), U/s.173 of the Motor Vehicles Act (in short, the M.V.Act), challenging the judgment of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Prl.District Judge, Eluru (in short, the Tribunal) dtd. 7/5/2018, wherein the Tribunal partly allowing the petition, awarded a compensation of Rs.50, 65, 000.00 with interest @ 7.5% p.a. from the date of petition, till the date of realisation, for the death of Madakam Rajulu in a motor vehicle accident occurred on 8/3/2015.

3. The appeal in MACMA No.1972/2018 is preferred by the 4th respondent/Appellant (in short, the A.P.S.R.T.C.) U/s.173 of the Motor Vehicles Act (in short, the M.V.Act), challenging the same judgment and sought for setting aside the judgment and decree passed in M.V.O.P.No.339/2015 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Prl.District Judge, Eluru (in short, the Tribunal).

4. The appeal in MACM

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top