SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Kar) 16

PADMANABHIAH, N.SREENIVASA RAU
B. K. ABDUL AZEEZ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MYSORE – Respondent


PADMANABHIAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application filed by the petitioner tinder Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of an appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing the ex-parte order of dismissal passed by the first respondent Government on the application made by him, and for restoration of the lands bearing S. Nos. 1 and 14 at Gubbi Town, which are ordered to be acquired.

( 2 ) THE facts that have given rise to this petition are briefly as follows: the petitioner is a resident of Gubbi Town and the 1st respondent is the State Government, the 2nd respondent being the Gubbi Town Municipality. The petitioner is the owner of s. No. 1 having an extent of 15 guntas and S. No. 14 having an extent of 31 guntas. The 1st respondent-Government started acquisition proceedings in respect of these lands at the instance of the 2nd respondent-Municipality. At that stage the petitioner, who had been permitted by the Deputy Commissioner to convert s. No. 14 into sites, applied for a stay of the proceedings for acquisition and a stay order was passed. But ultimately the 1st respondent-Government dismissed the application filed by the petitioner for dropping the acqui
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top