HONNAIH, NARAYANA PAI
C. CHIKKA VENKATAPPA – Appellant
Versus
D. HANUMANTHAPPA – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise out of OS. No. 33 of 1956 filed before the Court of the District Judge, Civil Station, Bangalore, under S 92 CPC. Five persons who had obtained the consent of the Advocate General required under the said section figured as the plaintiffs in the first instance subsequently, plaintiffs Nos 4 and 5 dropped out of the suit and the suit was continued only by the first three plaintiffs. The defendants are five in number. The prayers in the plaint were that the defendants should be removed from the offices they held in the Devanga Sangha (of which all the parties other than the 4th plaintiff were members) and that the defendants should be directed to render true and proper accounts in regard to the collections made by them on behalf of the Sangha in connection with the Silver Jubilee Building Fund of the Sangha. The first prayer was not granted. The second prayer was granted only by directing defendants 2 and 3 to render accounts. The suit was dismissed against defendants 1, 4, and 5. Defendants 2 and 3 have preferred Appeal No. 171 (1963 against the decree for accounts made against them. Plaintiffs have preferred Appeal no 9/1964 complaining
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.