SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Kar) 19

CHANDRASHEKHAR
MALAI KOLANDAI MUDALIAR – Appellant
Versus
M. R. SWAMINATHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
N.K.Gupta, S.V.Narasimhan

( 1 ) THIS revision petition under S. 50 of the Mysore Rent Control Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is by a tenant against whom a decree for eviction was passed by the Munsiff and affirmed in appeal by the district Judge. The premises were leased in the year 1956 and the tenant has been carrying on therein the business of vending Kadle and Pori.

( 2 ) THE landlord presented an application for eviction of the tenant on the grounds specified in clauses (a), (h) and (p) of the proviso to S. 21 (1) of the Act. Though the learned Munsiff found that the landlord bona fide requires the premises for his own use and occupation, the learned Munsiff herd that eviction could not be ordered under clause (h) of the said proviso, as the tenancy commenced prior to the coming into force of the Act and as the landlord wants the premises to start a business. However, the learned Munsiff decreed eviction under clause (p ). In appeal, the learned district Judge held that the ground specified in clause (p) was not established, but sustained the decree for eviction on a different ground, namely, that specified in clause (h ). In this petition, the learned Counsel for the landlord did not














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top