NESARGI
STATE OF MYSORE – Appellant
Versus
PANDURANG PARUSAPPA NAIK – Respondent
( 2 ) CERTAIN commodities had been seized by the police from the respondents on the ground that one or the other Food Control Orders had been violated by them. Proposals were put up to the Deputy Commissioner, north Kanara, under S. 6-A of the Act for confiscating the said commodities. The Deputy Commissioner passed an order confiscating the commodities to the Government and as against that, an appeal was preferred to the judicial authority under S. 6-C of the Act. The judicial authority set aside the order of confiscation passed by the Deputy Commissioner and, hence the State, aggrieved by the said order, has challenged the same in this petition.
( 3 ) SRI Suresh S. Joshi, the learned Counsel for the respondents, raised a preliminary objection and contended that the revision petition is not maintainable because the judicial authority is not an inferior criminal court as m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.