SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Kar) 119

NESARGI
STATE OF MYSORE – Appellant
Versus
PANDURANG PARUSAPPA NAIK – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.Laxmeshwar, SURESH S.JOSHI

( 1 ) THIS petition is directed against an order passed by the District and sessions Judge, N. K. , Karwar, under S. 6-C of the Essential commodities Act, 1955 (to be hereinafter referred to as the 'act'), as judicial authority appointed by the State Government by its notification S. O. No. 5886 dated 13-12-1966.

( 2 ) CERTAIN commodities had been seized by the police from the respondents on the ground that one or the other Food Control Orders had been violated by them. Proposals were put up to the Deputy Commissioner, north Kanara, under S. 6-A of the Act for confiscating the said commodities. The Deputy Commissioner passed an order confiscating the commodities to the Government and as against that, an appeal was preferred to the judicial authority under S. 6-C of the Act. The judicial authority set aside the order of confiscation passed by the Deputy Commissioner and, hence the State, aggrieved by the said order, has challenged the same in this petition.

( 3 ) SRI Suresh S. Joshi, the learned Counsel for the respondents, raised a preliminary objection and contended that the revision petition is not maintainable because the judicial authority is not an inferior criminal court as m







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top