SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Kar) 88

RANGE GOWDA, CHANDRASHEKHAR
M. M. THAMMAIAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MYSORE – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.Nanjappa, K.S.Gowrishankar, P.K.Shyam Sundar

CHANDRASHEKHAR, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER-1 is holder of a 'bane' land in Virajpet Taluk in Coorg district. He had sold timber standing on that land to petitioner-2. and he made an application to the Divisional Forest Officer, South Coorg division, (Respondent-2) for issue of a permit in the name of petitioner-2 to cut and remove such timber. Respondent-2 intimated petitioner-1 that as the land was not redeemed, he (respondcnt-2) had directed the Valuation officer. Virajpet, to value such timber under Rule 137 of the Mysore forest Rules, 1969.

( 2 ) IN this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners have prayed for striking down Rule 137 of the Mysore Forest Rules, 1969, (hereinafter referred to as the Forest Rules) as invalid. They have a]so prayed for a mandamus directing respondent-2 to issue a permit to the petitioners for conveying such timber. The Consolidated Coffee Ltd. . Pollibetta, Coorg District, who has filed a similar petition which is still pending, sought for permission to intervene in this petition. We permitted that Company to intervene in this petition. Sri A. C. Nanjappa, its learned Counsel, addressed arguments supplementing those of Mr. K. S. Gowris






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top