SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Kar) 222

NARAYANA PAI, NESARGI
G. R. GURURAJACHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MYSORE – Respondent


Advocates:
K.S.PUTTASWAMY, M.Rama Jois

NARAYANA PAI C. J.

( 1 ) WHEN the petitioner was serving as an Assistant Master in the government High School, Channapatna, a departmental enquiry was held against him on charges of having received illegal gratification for conferring official favours on certain persons and of having mis-appropriated sale proceeds of old Government gazette, etc. He was found guilty and punishment of stoppage of five increments and recovery of rs. 22 being the misappropriated amount was imposed by an order dated 11th of February 1959.

( 2 ) ON 6-1-1960. a notice under R. 26 of the Mysore Civil Service (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957, was issued to him to show cause why the punishment should not be enhanced to one of dismissal. He challenged that notice in WP. No. 68 of 1960 contending that though R. 26 is set out in the notice it was in effect only a notice under r. 27 by the State Government and that under the said latter rule, the government could not act because more than six months had elapsed from the date of imposition of punishment. His contention was accepted by this Court and the notice quashed by an order made on the 14th march 1962. The judgment of the Court is reported a



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top