SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Kar) 273

NESARGI
STATE OF MYSORE – Appellant
Versus
GHOUSUDDIN – Respondent


Advocates:
D.S.HULGUR, M.M.Jagirdar

( 1 ) THIS is a reference made by the Sessions Judge, Bidar, against an order passed under S. 488 Crlpc. by the First Class Magistrate, Bidar in crl. Case No. 81 of 1967.

( 2 ) THE few facts necessary for a decision in this case are: that responident-2 wife, filed an application against respondent-1 her husband under s. 488 Crlpc. claiming maintenance from him. The husband appeared through an Advocate and filed objections. Ultimately the wife came to be examined and cross-examined. Her cross-examination was completed on 21-7-1970. The order sheet of the date 21-7-1970 reads as follows "parties are present, cross-examination of PW. 1 and PW. 2, pw-3 and PW. 4's statement recorded. Petitioner's evidence. heard. Case adjourned for defence evidence call on 11-8-1970, on 11-8-1970, the Counsel appearing on behalf of the 'husband reported no instructions, and the case was adjourned to 17-8-1970 for arguments. On 17-8-1970 also it was adjourned for arguments to 24-8-1970: On 24-8-1-970 the arguments on behalf of the wife were heard, and orders were pronounced on 31-8-1970. By this order, the Magistrate has allowed the application of the wife and fixed the quantum of maintenance at Rs. 40








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top