NESARGI
STATE OF MYSORE – Appellant
Versus
GHOUSUDDIN – Respondent
( 2 ) THE few facts necessary for a decision in this case are: that responident-2 wife, filed an application against respondent-1 her husband under s. 488 Crlpc. claiming maintenance from him. The husband appeared through an Advocate and filed objections. Ultimately the wife came to be examined and cross-examined. Her cross-examination was completed on 21-7-1970. The order sheet of the date 21-7-1970 reads as follows "parties are present, cross-examination of PW. 1 and PW. 2, pw-3 and PW. 4's statement recorded. Petitioner's evidence. heard. Case adjourned for defence evidence call on 11-8-1970, on 11-8-1970, the Counsel appearing on behalf of the 'husband reported no instructions, and the case was adjourned to 17-8-1970 for arguments. On 17-8-1970 also it was adjourned for arguments to 24-8-1970: On 24-8-1-970 the arguments on behalf of the wife were heard, and orders were pronounced on 31-8-1970. By this order, the Magistrate has allowed the application of the wife and fixed the quantum of maintenance at Rs. 40
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.