SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Kar) 289

BHEMIAH
HIRIANNA SHETTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MYSORE – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.Laxmeshwar, P.RAMACHANDRA RAO

BHIMIAH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner was tried for an offence under S 324 of the Indian Penal code by the Additional Munsiff-cum-Magistrate (First Class), Udipi, on a charge-sheet filed by the Udipi Rural Police. The charge against the petitioner was that on 1-1-70 at about 7 A. M. , he voluntarily beat Gururaja bhatta (P. W. 1) with a firewood and caused simple hurt. Six P. Ws. were examined in support of the prosecution case. But the Investigating Officer was not examined by the prosecution. The learned Munsiff, after considering the evidence produced by the prosecution, found the accused guilty of the offence punishable under Sec. 324, sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment till the rising of the Court and to pay a fine of Rs. 100, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for one month.

( 2 ) THE accused challenged the legality and correctness of his conviction and sentence before the Sessions Judge of South Kanara at Mangalore in criminal Appeal No. 82 of 1970. The learned Sessions Judge, after hearing the parties found the accused guilty of the offence under S. 323, thus altering the conviction of the accused from S. S24 IPC. He confirmed the sentence of simple imprisonment










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top