SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Kar) 339

Karnataka High Court
SHA RUPCHAND HIDUMAL - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MYSORE - Respondent
Decided On : 12-01-71
W.P. : 315 of 1971

Advocates:
C.M.Desai, L.G.HAVANUR, P.K.Shyamasundar

Non-compliance with publication requirements under the Mysore Municipalities Act, 1964 rendered the notification invalid, inoperative, and void.

Headnote:

levy - octroi - Mysore Municipalities Act, 1964, Section 95, 96, 97 - The court held that the non-publication of essential matters in the Gazette publication under Section 97 rendered the notification invalid, inoperative, and void.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged the levy of octroi by the Ranebennur Town Municipal Council, arguing that the notification bringing into force the revised rates of octroi was illegal and unenforceable due to non-compliance with publication requirements.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the non-publication of essential matters in the Gazette publication under Section 97 rendered the notification invalid, inoperative, and void.

Issues: The main issue was whether the non-publication of essential matters in the Gazette publication under Section 97 rendered the notification invalid.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that a valid levy of tax can be brought into force on publication of a sanctioned resolution with notice as provided under Section 97, and the essential elements for a valid imposition of octroi must be present in the publication under Section 97 for the levy to be enforceable.

Final Decision: The court issued a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to forbear from levying or collecting octroi on the basis of the invalid notification.

GOVINDA BHAT, J.

( 1 ) IN this batch of 18 writ petitions, the petitioners who are merchants carrying on business in Ranebennur Town have challenged the levy of ocrroi by the Ranebennur Town Municipal Council (Respondent No. 2) pursuant to its Notification dated 2nd December 1970 published in the mysore Gazette dated 24th December 1970. By the impugned Notification, the 2nd respondent sought to bring into force with effect from 1st february 1971 the levy of octroi on goods imported into the Municipal area at the rates specified in the Schedule to the said Notification.

( 2 ) THE petitioners had raised a large number of grounds challenging the legality of the word levy in the pleadings; but Sri Havanur, their learned counsel pressed only one ground at the hearing. That ground was that the resolution, sanctioned under S. 96 with all modifications subject to which the sanction was given, has not been published by the Municipal Council in the Official Gazette and in the Municipality as required by S. 97 (1) of the Mysore Municipalities Act, 1964, hereinafter called 'the Act' and the notification bringing into force the revised rates of octroi is illegal and unenforceable and therefore void. In support of that contention, he relied on the decision of this Court in Manjanatha Setty v. State of Mysore, (1971) 1 Mys. L. J. 27, wherein it has been stated thus :"the mandate of the section requires that there shall be a publication of all resolutions sanctioned under S. 96 of the Act, with a notice reciting the sanction and the date and number thereof. The imposition of the tax prescribed by the sanctioned resolution would become operative from a date which shall be specified in such notice and which shall not be less than one month from the date of the publication. In other words, the resolution which was earlier passed by the Municipal Council specifying the requirements, like classes of persons, the amount or rate, and the octroi stations as laid down under s. 95 of the Act, if approved by the Government under S. 96 of the act, with modifications if any, shall be published under S. 97 of the act. There cannot be a valid imposition of the tax if the publication is not according to the mandatory requirements of the Section. "

( 3 ) THE Resolution of the Municipality under S. 95 of the Act was passed as Resolution No. 170 dated 20th September 1967. The said Resolution, inter alia, specified (a) the classes of persons liable to pay octroi, (b) exemptions from the levy, (c) the amount or rate of octroi and (d) the octroi Stations. It was submitted for sanction to the State Government who by their order dated 4th November 1970 accorded sanction without any modification.

( 4 ) THE Notification under S. 97 published in the Mysore Gazette dated 24th December 1970 has been made an Annexure to these writ petitions. It is not disputed that the Gazette publication does not contain the Resolution passed by the Municipality under S. 95 as sanctioned. The exemptions made from the levy and the Octroi stations, which were specified in the Resolution under S. 95, are not found in the Gazette publication under s. 97. Sri C. M. Desai, the learned counsel for the Municipal Council, submitted that there has been a substantial compliance with the mandatory requirements of S. 97 since the Notification has published the classes of goods, animals etc. on which octroi is levied with the rates of levy. He submitted that the non-publication of the classes of persons and property sought to be made liable, the exemptions from the levy and the specification of Octroi Stations is a mere irregularity not affecting the merits of the case and as such, its validity is not open to be questioned in view of sub-sec. (5) of S. 80 which states that no act done or proceeding taken under the Act shall be questioned on the ground merely of any defect or irregularity not affecting the merits of the case'.

( 5 ) THE question is, whether the non-publication of the matters referred to





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top