SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Kar) 4

HONNAIH, M.S.NESARGI
K. HANUMANTHA RAO – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL AERONAUTICAL LABORATORY – Respondent


Advocates:
BHAVANISHANKAR RAO, C.SRINIVASA IYENGAR, M.S.SUBBARAMU, S.V.SUBRAMANIAM

NESARGI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed against the award passed by the Motor Accidents claims Tribunal and I Additional District Jodge, Bangalore, in MV. Case no. 7/1969 holding that the application filed by the Claimant-appellant was not maintainable in view of an admitted fact that the accident in question had taken place within the private premises of National Aeronautic laboratory, Kodihalli, Bangalore and therefore not a public place.

( 2 ) IT is seen from the proceedings before the Tribunal that it was conceded as a fact, that the spot where the accident took place was not a public place as defined under the Motor Vehicles Act. Theiefore, the only question of law that falls for consideration in this appeal is whether a claims Tribunal constituted under S. 110 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, has or has not jurisdiction over matters arising out of accidents taking place in places which are not public places as defined under the Motor vehicles Act, 1939.

( 3 ) THE incident in question happened on 5-8-1968. The accidents claims Tribunals are constituted by virtue of the provisions of S. 110 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. S. 110 (1) as i,t stood prior to its amendment by 2-3-19




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top