SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Kar) 54

K.VENKATASWAMI
STATE OF MYSORE – Appellant
Versus
AKKAMMA – Respondent


Advocates:
M.Nagappa

VENKATASWAMI, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference under S. 438 of Crl. P. C. is by the Sessions Judge, dharwar. By an order made in Criminal Revision Petition No. 56/72, he has recommended to this court that an order made by the J. M. F. C. , dharwar in Misc. Application No, 83 72 be quashed. The said application had been made by the Complainant in C. C. No. 1571/71 requesting for the restoration of the complaint after setting aside the order of dismissal for default and acquitting the accused.

( 2 ) THE complaint was one under S. 323 I. P. C. and was triable by following the procedure prescribed under Chapter 20 of Cr. P. C. relating to the trial of summons cases. It would appear that on 18-1-1972, when the case was called on for hearing, the complainant wes absent. The learned Magistrate thereupon kept by the file and called the case later at about 1-20 p. M. Finding that the complainant still absent, he made an order acquitting the accused. Nearly a month thereafter on 19-2-72 the complainant presented the Misc. Application No. 83/72 requesting for the revival of the complaint. In the said application he tried to show cause for his absence on the previous date of hearing. The learned Magist




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top