SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Kar) 135

K.J.SHETTY, GOVINDA BHAT
MICHAEL FERNANDES – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX – Respondent


Advocates:
S.P.BHAT, S.R.RAJASEKHARAMURTHY

( 1 ) THIS is a batch of five writ petitions preferred by a common Assessee under the Wealth-Tax Act, 1957, hereinafter called the Act. The writ petitions relate to the assessment years 1964-65 to 1968-69. The petitioner did not file his returns on the due dates, but he filed the same on 16th December 1969 pursuant to notices issued to him under S. 17 (2) in respect of the first four assessment years and under S. 14 (2) for the assessment year 1968-69. His returns were accepted and he was assessed to tax ranging from Rs. 469 to Rs. 637 for the net wealth assessed by the petitioner. The petitioner preferred revision petitions against the net wealth, but the same were dismissed.

( 2 ) THE Wealth-Tax Officer initiated proceedings for imposition of penalty under S. 18 of the Act. By separate orders made on 22-8-1970 he imposed penalties ranging from Rs. 3,986 to Rs. 5,191. The total amount of penalty levied was Rs. 21,590. The total amount of tax for the five assessment years amounted to Rs. 2,570.

( 3 ) BEFORE the Wealth-Tax Officer, in response to notice issued under s. 18 (2) of the Act, the petitioner offered his written explanation to show that the belated returns were not without







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top