K.J.SHETTY, GOVINDA BHAT
KARUPAKULA SURYANARAYANA SETTY – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Respondent
( 1 ) THE Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench has stated a case and referred under S. 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the 'act') the following question of law for the opinion of this Court. " Whether on the facts and circumsatnqes of the Assessee's case when there was a change in the constitution of the Assessee firm the appellate Tribunal was justified in law in holding that only one assessment should be made. "
( 2 ) THE assessee is a partnership firm carrying on business in the manufacture of Agarbatties. The assessment year is 1966-67 for which the relevant previous year is the year ended 31-3-1966. There was a change in the constitution of the firm on 1-9-1965. Before the said date there were six partners in the firm. Thirteen more partners were introduced into the firm with effect from 1-9-1965.
( 3 ) THE, assessee filed a return on 1-8-1966 declaring an income of rs. 1,12,628. However, the said return was revised and two returns were filed in 31-10-1966; one return was for the period from 1-9-1965 to 31-3-1966. The contention of the assessee was that a new firm was constituted with effect from 1-9-1965 and therefore, for th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.