K.J.SHETTY
P. BALCHAND – Appellant
Versus
TAX RECOVERY OFFICER – Respondent
( 2 ) THE petitioner was a partner of the firm named 'hindusthan Jewellery mart' upto 13-11-1966. For the assessment year 1967-68 the said firm was assessed to income-tax as an unregistered firm. As per the assessment order dt. 12-2-1968, the firm was liable to pay Rs. 32,840. The petitioner unsuccessfully challenged the assessment order in appeal before the appellate assistant Commissioner and also on further appeal before the Income-tax appellate Tribunal. After 13-11-1966, the petitioner became a partner of a new firm named hindusthan Drug House.
( 3 ) ON 30-3-1969, the Income-tax Officer (Collection), Circle 1, Bangalore 1, issued a certificate under S. 222 of the Act to the Tax Recovery Officer, bangalore to recover a sum of Rs. 31,919 together with certain interest the certificate showed the ussessee in default as 'hindusthan Jewellery mart'. Pursuant to the said certificate, the Tax Recovery Officer issued a notice of demand for Rs. 35,710 to the Hindusthan Jewellery Mart. The petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.