SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Kar) 294

GOVINDA BHAT, SRINIVASA IYENGAR
KISHINDAS AGENCIES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MYSORE – Respondent


Advocates:
G.Sarangan, M.P.CHANDRAKANTRAJ

( 1 ) THESE revision petitions preferred by an assessee under S. 23 (1) of the mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957, hereinafter called the Act, relate to the assessment years 1967-68 and 1968-69. The assessee manufactures 'felt washers' which are used as components in the manufacture of 'micro filters'. During the assessment years, the assessee sold the 'felt washers' manufactured by him to M/s. Motor Industries Co. for manufacture of 'micro Filters'. Before the assessing authority the assessee claimed that on his turnover relating to sales of 'felt Washers' he is liable to pay tax only at the concessional rate provided under S. 5 (3a) of the Act, which claim was accepted by the Additional Commercial Tax Officer who passed the assessment orders.

( 2 ) HOWEVER, the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes in exercise of the powers conferred by S. 21 (2) of the Act, revised the orders of the Additional Commercial Tax Officer and held that the assessee is not entitled to the benefit of S. 5 (3a), but is liable to pay tax at the rate provided under S. 5 (1 ). Appeals preferred by the assessee against the said orders to the Mysore Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal having been dismissed, he has preferr







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top