SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Kar) 306

GOVINDA BHAT
RATNAVATHI – Appellant
Versus
MUNDA BELCHADA – Respondent


Advocates:
M.GOPALKRISHNA SHETTY, U.L.NARAYANA RAO

( 1 ) THE appellant was the plaintiff in O. S. No. 244 of 1968 on the file of the Court of the Munsiff, Buntwal (South Kanara ). That was a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule properties. During the pendency of the suit, the trial Court granted a temporary injunction. The suit was decreed in part. The plaintiff preferred r. A. No. 74 of 1973 in the Court of the Civil Judge at Mangalore. In the said appeal the plaintiff-appellant made an application for an order of temporary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff of the properties in respect of which the suit had been dismissed. The learned Civil Judge rejected that application on the ground that this Court in 1971 (1) Mys. L. J. Notes of Recent Cases, Item No. 165, has held that where the trial Court dismisses the suit, the appellate Court is not entitled to make an order of temporary injunction. The learned Civil Judge has read the decision as laying down that under no circumstances an order of temporary injunction can be made by the appellate Court whe




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top