SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Kar) 4

V.S.MALIMATH
BAFNA TEXTILES – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates:
K.SRINIVASAN, S.R.RAJASEKHARAMURTHY

( 1 ) THE petitioner M/s. Bafna represeated by its partner, has challenged in this writ petition the order dt. 6-3-1973 passed by the Incometax officer (Assessment 4) Circle II Bangalore under Sec. 132 (5) of the income Tax Act 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act by which a sum of Rs. 1 "lakh belonging to the petitioner has been retained.

( 2 ) ON the 6th of Decr. 1973 one Mahendra Kumar was carrying cash of Rs. One lakh when he was apprehended by the Central Excise Authorities at Salem near Valaypatty and the cash of Rs. 1 lakh found on the person of Mahendra Kumar was seized. On the 8th of Decr. 1972, the commr. of Income-tax for Mysore at Bangalore issued a warrant of authorisation under Sec. 132 (1) of the Act and Rule 112 (1) of the Income-tax rules, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) to V. Kalyan Sundaram, i Income-tax Officer, Circle II Salem 4 to search and seize the money of m. s. Bafna Textiles, C. S. Street. Bangalore which represents, the income which has not been disclosed for the purpose of Income-tax Act and which he has reason to suspect is to be found at the Office of the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Salem. In response to the aforesaid warra














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top