SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Kar) 223

K.J.SHETTY, VENKATACHALAIAH
UDAYA MOTOR TRANSPORT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
K.S.PUTTASWAMY, M.P.CHANDRAKANTRAJ, M.RANGASWAMY

VENKATRAMIAH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in these Writ petitions are operators of motor vehicales in the State of Karnataka under permits issued by the concerned authorities under the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act. Some of them are plying stage carriages,. some are owners of contract carriages and some are running public carriages. The petitioners originally had questioned in these writ petitions the validity of some of the provision of the Karnataka Motor. Vehicle (Taxation on Passengers and Goods) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act'), as amended by the Karnataka Motor Vehicles (Taxation on Passangers and Goods)' (Amendment) Ordinance, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the 'ordinance' ). During the; pendency of these writ petitions, the Ordinance was replaced by the Karnataka Motor vehicles (Taxation on Passengers arid Gopds) (Amendment) Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the 'amending Act' ). On the, applications made by the petitioners we have permitted them to question the validity of the provision's of the Act as amended by the amending Act in these writ petitions. 2. Since common questions of law and facts arise for consideration in these cases, we dispose t













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top