K.J.SHETTY
MANGALA BAI – Appellant
Versus
SAYYAD FAKIR – Respondent
( 2 ) THE facts leading up to the appeal are these: ayyad Hanif Shah and his wife Imanbu executed two mortgage deeds in respect of certain property on 28th Feb, 1882 and 25th Jan, 1883. They died before redeeming the mortgages. The dispute arose among the persons claiming to be the legal heirs of the mortgagors as to who should redeem the mortgages. A suit for declaration was instituted in the Munsiff Court, haliyal stating that the plaintiffs together with defendants 5 to 7 are the heirs entitled to redeem the mortgages. The appellants before me resisted the said suit contending, inter alia, that the plaintiffs are not the heirs of the mortgagors. The trial Court decreed the suit declaring that the plaintiffs alone are thq heirs entitled to redeem the mortgages. Aggrieved by the decree, defendants 1 to 4 preferred an appeal in thq Court of the Civil judge, N. Kanara. During
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.