SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Kar) 54

K.J.SHETTY
MANGALA BAI – Appellant
Versus
SAYYAD FAKIR – Respondent


Advocates:
B.V.Krishnaswamy Rao, T.S.RAMACHANDRAN, V.TARKARAM

( 1 ) THIS appeal preferred under Or. 43, R. 1 (k) CPe arises out of an order made by the Civil Judge, Karwar on I. A. Nos. I to IV in C. A. 571 of 1965 holding that the appeal has abated consequent on the failure of the appellants to bring on record the legal representatives of one of the respondents therein.

( 2 ) THE facts leading up to the appeal are these: ayyad Hanif Shah and his wife Imanbu executed two mortgage deeds in respect of certain property on 28th Feb, 1882 and 25th Jan, 1883. They died before redeeming the mortgages. The dispute arose among the persons claiming to be the legal heirs of the mortgagors as to who should redeem the mortgages. A suit for declaration was instituted in the Munsiff Court, haliyal stating that the plaintiffs together with defendants 5 to 7 are the heirs entitled to redeem the mortgages. The appellants before me resisted the said suit contending, inter alia, that the plaintiffs are not the heirs of the mortgagors. The trial Court decreed the suit declaring that the plaintiffs alone are thq heirs entitled to redeem the mortgages. Aggrieved by the decree, defendants 1 to 4 preferred an appeal in thq Court of the Civil judge, N. Kanara. During













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top