SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Kar) 65

V.S.MALIMATH
G. AILDAS – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN, CITB – Respondent


Advocates:
C.V.GURUVE GOWDA, M.N.VENKITACHALAM, M.P.CHANDRAKANTRAJ

( 1 ) THE petitioners allege that they are the owners of about 3 acres in land survey Nos. 441 and 442 of Kempapura Agrahara, near Magadi Road Bangalore. It is their case that permission has been taken to convert the said land for non-agricultural purposes. It is their further case that they applied to the first respondent - The Bangalore City Improvement Trust Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board) for sanction of private layout on the aforesaid land. It is their further case that the prayer for sanction of the layout was granted by the Board by its resolution d/. 11th of Nov, 1970 under subject No. 297 subject to usual conditions, and that when certain modifications in the layout were proposed, the modified layout was sanctioned by the Board on the 8th of Dec, 1971, under Subject No. 557, copy of which is produced in the case as Ext 'a'. In pursuance of the said resolution the petitioners were informed by the Board by their letter dated the 20th of august, 1973 that the layout proposed by the petitioners has been sanctioned as modified by the Board subject to the petitioners satifyjng certain conditions imposed by them. One of the conditions imposed was that the petitioners










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top