SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Kar) 78

GOVINDA BHAT
ARJANADAS JHAMATMAL SADARANGANI – Appellant
Versus
FATIMA BI – Respondent


Advocates:
R.NARAYANAN NAIR, U.L.NARAYANA RAO

( 1 ) THIS revision petition arises out of an application made in OS. 322 74 on the file of the Court of the Munsiff, Civil Staltion, Bangalore, for an order of temporary injunction restraining the respondents 1 and 2 from executing the order for eviction passed under the House Rent Control Act. The trial court refused to pass an order of temporary injunction and that order has been affirmed on appeal to the Court of the Civil Judge, Civil Station, Bangalore in MA. 10/74. Hence this revision petition by the plaintiff-petitioner who has been aggrieved by the order of the Courts below.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY Stated, the facts are: The suit relates to certain business premises in the City of Bangalore. The landlord filed eviction petition in hrc. 188/69 in the Court of the Munsiff, Civil Station. The party respondent in the HRC case has been described as Jhamatmal Sons. Notice of that petition was served on respondent 4. The mother of respondent 4 however contested the proceedings before the HRC Court. The Munsiff dismissed the petition for eviction. On appeal by the landlord, that order of the Munsiff was affirmed; but on a revision petition filed by the landlord the orders of the Courts belo








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top