SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Kar) 49

VENKATACHALAIAH
RAJ MOHAMMED – Appellant
Versus
SAEEDA AMINA BEGUM – Respondent


Advocates:
M.M.JAHAGIRDAR

( 1 ) THIS second appeal arises out of the suit instituted in the year 1969 on the file of the Munsiff, Raichur, by the plaintiff for a decree fox restitution of conjugal rights against the defendant.

( 2 ) THE parties to the suit are Muslims. The plaintiff, who is the husband, is a resident of Raichur. He took the defendant in marriage at Hyderabad on the 17th of May, 1963. Thereafter the defendant came over to Raichur and lived with the plaintiff. By Deer 1966 two children were born to them. In Deer 1966 the defendant left for Hyderabad. The case of the plaintiff was that she had gone away to Hyderabad since he was not willing to leave ' his parents and shift hims,it to Hyderabad. The defendant's case was that some time after the marriage, the plaintiff began to make demands on her father to provide him with a motor cycle, a gold ring etc, and as the said demands were not complied with, he began to ill-treat her. On coming to know of it, her father came to Raichur and took her away to Hyderabad. She did not thereafter return to Raichur. In May 1969, the defendant issued a notice to the plaintiff calling upon him to pay her and her children maintenance. The said notice was replied











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top