SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Kar) 88

GOVINDA BHAT, VENKATACHALAIAH
KARNATAKA BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
GAJANAN SHANKARARAO – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.HOLLA, V.KRISHNA MURTHY

VENKATACHALAIAH, J, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the plaintiff in O. S. 10 of 1967 on the file of the Civil judge at Hubli is directed against that part of the judgment and decree dated 25-2-1972 by which the Court-below, while granting a decree against the principal-debtor, the first defendant in the suit for the sum of Rupees 32,757 negatived the claim against the sureties, defendants 2 and 3 who are respondents 1 and 2 respectively in this appeal.

( 2 ) APPELLANT claiming to be the successor-in-interest of Bank of karnataka Ltd, Hubli, instituted the suit from which this appeal arises, for the recovery of the sum. of Us. 32, 757 against the first defendant as the principal debtor in enforcement of the pronote for Rs. 25,000, Ext. P1, and the hypothecation bond, Extp2, relating to the Truck MYG 3031 and against defendants 2 and 3, on the basis of the surety bond, Ext. P3; the said transactions under Exts. P1, P2 and P3 having been entered into by the defendants with the Bank of Karnataka Ltd, Hubli. Appellant claims that the assets and liabilities of the said Bank of Karnataka are taken over by the appellant on 29-12-1966.

( 3 ) THE defence urged by respondents 1 and 2 in the Court bel

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top