SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Kar) 38

VENKATACHALAIAH
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
C. R. PRABHANNA – Respondent


Advocates:
H.G.Balakrishna, S.UDAY SHANKAR

( 1 ) THE question that arises for consideration in this second appeal relates to the jurisdiction of the trial Court to entertain the suit out of which this appeal arises.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff's in OS. No. 581 of 1967 on the file of the Munsiff, Tumkur, instituted the said suit for recovery of damages or compensation for loss of goods which had been consigned by defendant-3 under Railway Receipt no. 344699 Invoice No. C-42 dated 18-9-1965 at Wadi Bunder Railway station, Bombay, in favour of the plaintiffs. The place of destination of in goods wag mentioned as Bangalore Citv Railway Station in the said railway Receipt. Defendant-3 sent the Railway Receipt to the plaintiffs through the State Bank of Mysore, Tumkur Branch, Tumkur. The plaintiffs paid the amount payable to defendant through the State Bank of mysore, Tumkur, and took delivery of the Railway Receipt with the endorsement made in their favour by the Bank, The goods in question were not delivered to the plaintiffs till about January 1966. The plaintiffs, therefore, issued a notice to the Chief Commercial Superintendent of the southern Railway and thereafter filed the suit on 4-10-1967 in the Court of the Munsiff, Tumkur, fo








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top