SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Kar) 82

LAL
B. S. TOOKAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
A.B.PATIL, B.VEERABHADRAPPA

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the judgment of the Sessions Judge, shimoga, confirming on appeal under S. 454 of the Crlpc the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sagar, and thereby sanctioning the disposal of property in favour of the complainant.

( 2 ) THE accused one B. S. Tookappa is the proprietor of a rice mill known as Sri Veerabhadreswara Rice and Flour Mill situate at the village benavalli of Hosanagar Taluk. He was appointed as sub-agent by the taluk Agricultural Produce Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd, Hosanagar (hereinafter to be referred as the Co-operative Society ). The Cooperative society was engaged in procuring levy of paddy from the growers through the food Corporation of India. After the levy was complete, the Co-operative Society used to hand over the paddy to the petitioner- accused for keeping the same in their godown for which charges were to be paid. Upon receiving directions from the Co-operative Society, the paddy was required by the petitioner-accused to be hulled, for which hulling charges were paid. Accordingly between the dates 1-5-1973 and 24-5-1973 certain transactions were made between the Co-operative Society and the petit










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top