SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Kar) 156

M.S.NESARGI
T. KRISHNA MURTHY – Appellant
Versus
K. SHYAMA RAO – Respondent


Advocates:
A.N.JAYARAM NAIDU, KASHINATH DEY, P.R.SRINIVASAN

( 1 ) THIS petition is filed under Sec. 482 of the Crlpc, praying that inherent powers of this Court be invoked to set aside the order dt. 1-12-1976 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate (VI Court), Bangalore City in cc. No. 837 of 1975.

( 2 ) THE few necessary facts are that the said case was registered on a private complaint instituted on 21-6-1975. After the petitioners appeared in response to the summons issued to them i. e. , after the Court took cognizance of the offence and issued summons, they raised a few contentions and one of them was that the complaint was not maintainable as there was already an appeal pending as against the order said to have been relied upon in the complaint. The learned Magistrate has rejected this contention.

( 3 ) FROM what has been stated in the preceding paragraph, it is clear that the order in question is an interlocutory order within the meaning of Sec. 397 (2) Criminal Procedure Code.

( 4 ) IT is also clear that no criminal revision petition could have been filed by the petitioners as Sec. 397 (2) Crlpc prevents, this Court from exercising its revisional jurisdiction in such matters. In order to circumvent this legal hurdle the petitioners ha




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top