M.S.NESARGI
M. P. KENCHACHARY – Appellant
Versus
LAND TRIBUNAL, MUDIGERE – Respondent
( 2 ) THE main contention of the petitioners is that the Tribunal has, in view of Ss. 126 and 138 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), jurisdiction to go into the claims of the petitioners and it has failed in its duty by rejecting their claims and directing them to approach the Special Deputy Commissioner for Inams abolition, Hassan.
( 3 ) BY the impugned order the Tribunal has stated that the lands being classified as devadaya inam as per R. R. No. 239, the issue lies outside the purview of the Act and therefore, the parties were to approach the Special Deputy Commissioner, for Inams Abolition, Hassan.
( 4 ) SRI J. M. Riazuddin, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners, relied on the decision of this Court in Ramakrishnaiah vs. Land Reforms Tribunal, Ramanagar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.