SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Kar) 160

M.RAMA JOIS
FAKIRAPPA YELLAPPA KALI – Appellant
Versus
COMMR. , DHARWAD – Respondent


Advocates:
B.B.MANDAPPA, R.H.CHANDAN GOUDAR, U.L.NARAYANA RAO

( 1 ) AN important question of law touching the jurisdiction of this Court under art 226 (1) (b) of the Constitution of India to entertain writ petitions against an order of the concerned Returning Officer rejecting or accepting a nomination paper filed in connection with an election to a Taluk Development Board or a village Panchayat under the provisions of the Karnataka Village Panchayats and Local Boards Act, 1959, arises for consideration in these three writ petitions.

( 2 ) IN the first writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection of his nomination paper for election to a Taluk Development Board. In the other two writ petitions, the petitioners are aggrieved by the the acceptance of nominations papers of two candidates for election to a Village Panchayat. The Taluk Development Boards and Village Panchayats in the State are constituted and functioning under the provisions of the Karnataka Village panchayats and Local Boards Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' ). The election to the Taluk Development Boards and Village Panchayats is regulated by the common rules called the Karnataka Panchayats and Taluk boards Eleciiou Rules, 1959 (hereinafter referred















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top