SABHAHIT
NANDINARAVANDA MEDAPPA – Appellant
Versus
NANDINARAVANDA GANAPATHY – Respondent
( 2 ) THE plaintiff averred that, plaint 'a' and 'b' Schedule properties belonged to them they being bane lands (Privileged tenures of Coorg ). The plaintiff claimed partition and separate possession of his share as also costs of the suit and other ancillary reliefs.
( 3 ) THE defendants inter alia contended that the suit for partition ot bane lands was not maintainable.
( 4 ) A preliminary issue was raised in the suit whether the suit fot partition of bane lands which were part of privileged tenures of Coorg was maintainable. The learned Munsiff, on hearing the arguments of the learned Counsel appearing for both the parties, answered the issue in the negative and dismissed the suit of the plaintiff.
( 5 ) AGGRIEVED by the said judgment and decree, the plaintiff went up in appeal b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.