SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Kar) 71

BHEMIAH
T. M. RENUKAPPA – Appellant
Versus
FAHMIDA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.V.ACHARYA RAO, N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA, S.GURUSHANTAPPA

( 1 ) THE above miscellanous first appeal is directed against the judgment and award passed by the District Judge Chitradurge in M. V. C. . No. 12 of 1971 dated 5-11-1976 fixing the liability of the insurer at Rs. 10,000/- out of the total compensation of Rs. 25. 048/- and the owner of the vehicle bearing no. MYT 3887 for payment of the balance amount to respondents 1 to 4.

( 2 ) THE appellant is the owner of the lorry bearing No. MYT 3887. Respondents 1 to 4 are the claimants. Respondent-5 is the insurer. Respondent-6 is the driver.

( 3 ) THE claimants instituted a patition before the Motor Accidents Claims tribunal at Chitradurga, claiming compensation of a lakh of rupees for death of one Mohamed Ameer, the husband of the 1st claimant and father of respondents 2 to 4, arising out of the motor accident which took place on 13-3-1971, when he (deceased) was travelling in the said goods vehicle from Davanagere to Hiriyur with his goods loaded in the said vehicle. Facts of the case are that Mohammed Ameer was travelling from davanagere to Harihar with his goods loaded in the vehicle MYT 3887. At 101|2 mile stone near Vanivilasa Sagar Mills, Hiriyur town, the lorry dashed against anoth




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top