SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Kar) 126

VENKATASWAMI
H. ESWARAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.G.SRIDHARAN, T.S.RAMACHANDRAN

( 1 ) THESE four petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are directed against four orders of the Land Tribunal, Shimoga District, Shimoga, passed in its proceedings. (i) No. LRF (T) KMH-23/74-75 dt. 27-12-76 (ii) No. LRF (T) KMN-17/74-75 dt. 27-12-76 (iii) No. LRF (T) KMH-18/74-75 dt. 6-1-77 and (iv) No. LRF (T) K. MN-14/74-75 dt. 27-12-76. (Exhibits 'd' to 'g') respectively.

( 2 ) THE lands involved in these cases are situated in a village called Kommanal, shimoga Taluk. The writ petitioners filed applications before the Tribunal separately in form No. 7 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, (the Act) claiming occupancy rights in respect of the lands mentioned in their applications. Gangamma, Nanjundappa, and Parameshwarappa who had been arrayed as opponents before the Tribunal Contested the claims of these petitioners stating that the lands in question were Patel Umbli lands; they were the real hakdars ; that the lands have not been regranted to them under the Karnataka Village offices Abolition Act, 1961, (the Act of 1961); and that therefore, the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider the claims of the applicants. They wanted the (petitioners)













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top