NAGAPPA
SUDARSHAN MANCHANDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
( 2 ) THE first petitioner is the Executive Director of M/s. Prakash roadlines (P) Ltd. , and the second petitioner is the Management of the said M/s. Prakash Roadlines (P) Ltd. , which is carrying on, its business of transporting goods at Kalasipalayam New Extension, Bangalore. The business of the Management of M/s. Prakash Roadlines (P) Ltd. , is to receive goods for transhipment to other places from Bangalore and thet goods transported to Bangalore from other places for being delivered the same. The Management has to store the goads so received in their godowns in the said premises and, thereafter, to transport the same to different destinations through their lorries or to deliver the goods to the consignees.
( 3 ) IT is the case of the prosecution that by so storing the goods in question the Petitioners had violated S. 13 of the Karnataka Fire Farce act, 1964, and the Notification issued thereunder
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.