( 1 ) THE appellant was the petitioner before the trial Court-

( 2 ) THIS is an appeal by the unsuccessful husband who wanted to escape from the sacred bonds of marriage on the grounds which, unfortunately for the appellant, are held to be attributable to him and not to the respondent. The trial Court has dismissed the petition in pursuance of the findings recorded by it that the appellant has failed to establish that non-consummation of the marriage was due to the impotency of the respondent, further nor was it due to any repulsive and non-cooperative conduct on the part of the respondent to effectuate the sexual intercourse, by the decree dated 25th September 1972 passed in m. C. No. 7 of 1972. Before the trial court as well as before us, it was not disputed that there was no consumermation of the marriage and it was also conceded in the trial Court that the character of the respondent was not at all assailed in the proceedings. Before us also, nothing was said about the character of the respondent. The trial Court, on appreciation of the evidence has found that the non-consummation of the marriage was not due to any impotency or repulsive and non-cooperative conduct on