K.S.PUTTASWAMY
VIRUPAKSHAPPA – Appellant
Versus
DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER BELGAUM – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this petition, under Art. 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 11-7-1977 of the divisional Commissioner, Belgaum Dn. , belgaum (hereinafter referred to as the 'dc. ') in Revision Petition No. MUM. Br. A. 18 (EEx. 'h' ).
( 2 ) THE petitioner is a resident of bagalkot City at which place there is a city Municipality constituted under the provisions of the Karnataka Municipalities Act of 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act' ). On or about 23-6-1976, respondent No. 4 applied to the Chief officer of the Municipality for a license under S. 256 of the Act for running a calcite factory in that City, which was opposed by the petitioner on various grounds. On a consideration of the contentions urged by the parties in support of their respective cases, the chief Officer, by his order No. PHD. WP. PMM/639/74-75 dated 10-12-1976 ex. 'j') overruled the objections filed by the petitioner and directed the issue of a license to respondent No. 4 on the terms and conditions set out therein. In pursuance of the said order, on the same day, the Chief Officer, also issued a license to respondent No. 4 (Ex. 'e' ). Against the order date
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.