SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Kar) 224

K.S.PUTTASWAMY
VIRUPAKSHAPPA – Appellant
Versus
DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER BELGAUM – Respondent


Advocates:
ANNADANAYA PURANIK, I.S.ANTIN, PADMANABHA MAHALE, U.L.NARAYANA RAO

K. S. PUTTASWAMY, J.

( 1 ) IN this petition, under Art. 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 11-7-1977 of the divisional Commissioner, Belgaum Dn. , belgaum (hereinafter referred to as the 'dc. ') in Revision Petition No. MUM. Br. A. 18 (EEx. 'h' ).

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a resident of bagalkot City at which place there is a city Municipality constituted under the provisions of the Karnataka Municipalities Act of 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act' ). On or about 23-6-1976, respondent No. 4 applied to the Chief officer of the Municipality for a license under S. 256 of the Act for running a calcite factory in that City, which was opposed by the petitioner on various grounds. On a consideration of the contentions urged by the parties in support of their respective cases, the chief Officer, by his order No. PHD. WP. PMM/639/74-75 dated 10-12-1976 ex. 'j') overruled the objections filed by the petitioner and directed the issue of a license to respondent No. 4 on the terms and conditions set out therein. In pursuance of the said order, on the same day, the Chief Officer, also issued a license to respondent No. 4 (Ex. 'e' ). Against the order date











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top