SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Kar) 3

M.P.CHANDRAKANTARAJ
A. PRABHAKARA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


M. P. CHANDRAKANTARAJ, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition coming up for further order, by consent of counsel for petitioner and Respondents 1 and 2, is; taken up for final hearing and disposed of by the following order;

( 2 ) THE Court felt that Respondents 3 and 4 were not necessary parties while issuing the rule. Therefore, no notice had gone to them.

( 3 ) IN this Writ Petition the petitioner has prayed for a Writ of Mandamus from tnis Court to Respondents 1 and 2 to transfer him to the Bangalore medical College (Government College) affiliated to the Bangalore University from the Government Medical College, hubli, where he is now prosecuting his studies in M. B. B. S. Course, consequent upon his selection and allotment to the Karnataka Medical College, Hubli (affiliated to the Karnataka Universily ).

( 4 ) THE petitioner has founded his right to Writ of mandamus on Rule 9 read with Rule 11 of Karnataka medical Colleges (Selection for admission) Rules, 1978 (here-in-after referred to as 'the Rules' ).

( 5 ) SRI Gangi Reddy, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner has strenuously argued that the Selection committee was bound to allot, after selection of candidates to the Government Medica











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top