SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Kar) 43

M.RAMA JOIS, SRINIVASA IYENGAR
LAKSHMI COCONUT INDUSTRIES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


( 1 ) THE sixteen sales-tax appeals are preferied by two dealers in desiccated coconut, aggrieved by the orders of the commissioner of Commercial Taxes made in exercise of his suo motu power of revision under S. 22-A of the Karnataka Sales-tax Act, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') setting aside the orders of the assessing authority for the relevant assessment years exempting their inter-state sale turnover cf desiccated coconut from sales-tax under the provisions of the Central. Sales- tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Central Act') and bringing the same to tax under S 8 of the Central act. Four revision petitions are preferred by the State aggrieved by the order of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal upholding the claim of the respon lentfirm therein, which is also a dealer in desiccated coconut that inter-state sales of desiccated coconut are not exigible to tax under the Central Act. All these cases were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment as the same question of law arises for consideration in all these cases which is as follows: whether, the assessees, who had effected inter-state sales of desiccated coconut prepared by them out of

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top